Tax relief for losses on incorporation
A sole trader is considering incorporating, which makes commercial sense. However, they have a loss for the current tax period due to coronavirus. Will the new company be able to utilise this?

Transferring a loss-making business
HMRC has long had special rules to prevent businesses shifting losses for tax avoidance purposes. There has been some softening of the rules in recent years but there are still restrictions. Where the original and the acquiring businesses are both run by companies, special rules restrict the extent to which the latter is entitled to tax relief for losses made by the other company. A different set of rules apply if an unincorporated business, i.e. a partnership (or LLP) or owned by a sole trader, is transferred to a company.
Using losses to reduce tax
Usually, if a company’s trade makes a loss for a financial period it can use it to reduce its tax bill on income or profits it makes from other activities in the same or the previous financial year. Or it can carry the loss forward indefinitely to reduce tax on profits of a later year. Similar rules allow owners of unincorporated businesses to get tax relief for losses by reducing the tax payable on their other income or profits. However, losses of companies can’t be used to reduce the personal tax of its owners (shareholders) and neither can losses of an unincorporated businesses be used to reduce the tax on company profits.
Rules for previous business losses
It seems from the rules explained above that on two counts there’s no way of getting tax relief for losses made by an unincorporated business against profits from a company which acquires it. However, there’s an exception to these rules which is often overlooked.
Where tax relief for losses of an unincorporated business has not been used to reduce the tax bill on the business owner’s income, it can be used against the tax payable on the income (salary or dividends) they take from a company which acquires the loss-making businesses. There are two conditions for this:
- the company must carry on the same trade, alone or with other trades, as the unincorporated businesses
- the trade of the unincorporated business must be exchanged wholly or mainly for shares in the company which acquires it, i.e. the owner of the unincorporated business must be given shares by the company as compensation for transferring the trade.
Example. Acom Associates is a partnership equally owned by Andy and Winston. They transfer Acom’s business to Xcom Ltd. Acom’s final accounts show a loss of £60,000. Neither Andy nor Winston claim tax relief for their share of the losses. Xcom pays Andy and Winston only a small cash sum for Acom’s business; the main payment (at least 80%) is in the form of shares in Xcom. Andy and Winston can pay themselves salary, or if Xcom makes a profit, dividends, and use Acom’s tax losses to reduce or eliminate any tax they would otherwise have to pay on the income.
While dividends are usually the most tax-efficient method of taking income from a company, where tax relief for losses is available salary can be more tax efficient.
Claiming relief. To get tax relief for losses of an unincorporated business against later income from your company a claim must be made (in writing or on a self-assessment tax return) within four years following the tax year in which the individual wants to use the losses.
Related Topics
-
Capital gains tax break for job-related accommodation
You’re in the process of selling a property that you bought as your home but because of your job have never lived in. You’ve been told that you’ll have to pay tax on any gain you make, but might a special relief get you off the hook?
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?